The new Kir


Go to page: 1, 2, 3 Bookmark Thread
Schley

2:44pm Oct 28 2011 (last edited on 9:15am Oct 29 2011)

Normal User


Posts: 41
 If you do Kir or not, you most likely know the pets just disappear. I feel sorry for these poor pets, their owner once prized them, and now they are tossed to be wiped out of the system.  I want to help these pets, and turn Kir from killing, to giving.
  First, a user goes to Kir to request a pet, let's say a calico zenirix. The next Kir quester gets the quest, and will get the same rewards as when Kir was a killer. The quester will turn in the pet, and the other user (the first person who requested it) will get it.
  This would make it easier for users to get their dream pets, or pets they want to collect. The pets would have owners. No more wiped pets! No more poor pets wiped!

There will be banners and images soon.
Rewards will come soon too for supporters!



Outsane

2:56pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 2,148
The pets are going to the people populating Kir's home planet, Uldavi. I don't think that we need them as much as Kir's planet does. They don't have any creatu except for Ivik and RSTU001 and getting all these new ones is like Christmas for them!

I don't support, sadly.




JessiKorpse

2:56pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 288
I kinda like this idea, then again, it does help make the game more challenging to reach goals... sort of a fun aspect. However, this would be pretty cool... it would make me wanna play the Quest more often. o 3o



^Click^
omnoms

3:03pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 1,938

I think it's fair that the pets go poof.
It would be just so.. black and white.

Kir asks you, for example, mutant ebilia. You are sad to die, someone who gets it would die of happiness.

Kir asks you natural zenirix. You would be happy to death of the easy task, and again, the dude who gets it, would think it's very lame.

I think the Kir's mission is, at the same, try to decrease the amount of Creatu in Res, which is good for their population i guess, because less pets = they are more wanted, the economy goes well too because Ranchers get more money for pets that people like to buy.


I dont support. Sorry. 
Kir's quest, even it is very demanding for most of us, is.. for good. In the long haul.






Schley

3:08pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
Kir wipes the pets, he doesn't give them to his home planet.



Schley

3:14pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
We have a banner now! URL is http://tinyurl.com/4ywnptd 



nightowl123

3:26pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 121
http://tinyurl.com/4ywnptd 



nightowl123

3:26pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 121
i support completely



Schley

3:31pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
Yay, two supporters! We will be giving gifts to our supporters soon!



EmuCat

3:40pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 17
I think Kir is agood way to keep the huge Res pet population down...and it's a challenge. Sure, you want to throttle him, and there's a rumour round the SB that he uses them as pizza toppings...but his advantages outweigh his disadvantages. Nice idea...but...I don't support, sorry.
Schley

3:43pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
He kills them, he wipes beloved pets for people to attempt to get a RSTU001! We will give rewards to supporters, and please can haters leave?



dogpaw49

3:43pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 2,836
i support! this will make me happy!



Foo

3:44pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 1,369
No support. 

Kir was invented to decrease the number of pets in the system. If we didn't want the pets to poof having kir would be pointless.

Plus, honestly, I'd be mad if my albino seasonal went to someone turning in a nattie zenirix. Perhaps that's mean of me, but I'd much rather it get deleted as it was hard work getting that pet to turn in just to have it go to someone else. 



~♥~
Schley

3:45pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
Three supporters! Soon I will send gifts to supporters!



EmuCat

3:48pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 17
wolfie: we're not being haters...you posted in suggestions, so we are debating your proposition. It's not up to us, we're just stating our points of view.
Dean

3:51pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 243
Actually, since no one but Kir and probably Pat can access Uldavi right now, no one really can guarantee what's happening to those poor pets.
And think about it this way, you don't HAVE to do Kir. The people doing Kir may gripe and moan about it, but they're doing it for some of the prizes that Kir gives out, like the ivik or the RSTU case. There is no time limit on a quest either, so if you get an albino ebilia, or something special, and you don't want to give him your only one, you can take the time and try to hatch another one, or buy one. 

Your system, while though it sounds nice and cute and seems good for those users who cannot possibly afford to buy a colored pets, is illogical. What would the user who GIVES the pet receive? Say a user gives out a natural zenirix to Kir. The next user comes and is asked for an albino seasonal. They give the seasonal, and then all they receive is a natural zenirix with a possibly awful name! So then the next person comes, and gives out another poorly named natural creatu, and they receive an albino seasonal. 

That's just my thoughts anyway, and because of the reasons listed above and because of other reasons, I'm going to say I really don't support this.
Schley

3:51pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
Yes, I understand, but I don't want haters spamming "This sucks!" or "Nobody will like this!" because it will spam the thread with bad thoughts that will make supporters leave.



PlainclothesWoman

3:52pm Oct 28 2011

Normal User


Posts: 561
Yes, the pets get wiped from the system, but the story is that they go to Uldavi. That's why they get wiped. 

I don't think that person meant they were ACTUALLY going to another planet... unless they have acute schizophrenia or something...

The point of Kir is to keep creatu numbers at an acceptable level, so they aren't too cheap and the economy works. If all creatu were only worth 1k due to over-population, then Res would be no fun, as there would be no goals, and no point.

It was introduced for this purpose - as the economy would break otherwise.

I am sorry to be so blunt, but no support, even though I do think the Kir system needs tweaking.





What\'s up?
punchbuggy

8:10am Oct 29 2011

Normal User


Posts: 517
"unless they have acute schizophrenia or something..."
lol plain

Anyways, I don't know if this is a good idea or not. I do think that Kir was created only to keep the population down. I don't know when we will be able to access Uldavi or if well be able to at all, but maybe the pets will go there. But think of how you would feel if you had to turn in a bino seasonal (like 40mil) and got in reward a nattie zenrix. And what if the person who turned in your zennie got the ebilia. Now, this ebilia happened to be your first bino ever hatched and it had a nice name. Then you had to work to get the ebilia back.
I would feel kinda lowsy.
Were not being haters, but you have to take everyhing into consideration in the suggestion forum. thats why they're called "suggestions"



Schley

9:10am Oct 29 2011

Normal User


Posts: 41
You would get the same rewards as before Kir killed.
Economy fixer: Make eggs rarer.



Go to page: 1, 2, 3