Small Suggestions


Go to page: 1 Bookmark Thread
Vampire

11:38pm Jul 27 2014

Support


Posts: 43
I've had a few ideas and thought I'd see what everyone thinks:

#1: Have some sort of link in the Pet auctions that lets us view users other auctions (similar to what the item trade has)

#2: If possible, a way to search though the pet auctions or have the search pets go directly to a specific pets auction when clicking on pet Auctions, or even have a link on our profiles that link to a list of all the pets we're currently auctioning.

#3: Have some sort of system that is quicker to find where a name is located on a pet (maybe something that lets us go directly to the pets profile etc..)

#4: Categories for the hatchery (we can have them in our shops, why not in the hatchery?)

#5: we have individual dye kits, why not other beans for specific natural colors? We have the calico bean, and the Natural Colored Jelly Bean, but nothing else. I think it would be interesting if we had more beans like we do with the dye kits.

#6: Not sure its possible, but maybe an event of sorts where the Regression Ray is on a limited time sale either in the black market or in the CS. I know its rare in all, but the only ones in play are what other users have.

#7: Bring back the job tower? The tower would give us all something else to do, plus it would give more value to the token shop.

#8: Have a maximum end date for the pet auctions please? Allowing users to set them to 2049 is going a little overboard. Maybe have a maximum of 2-3 weeks for an end date.

#9: Have a page either in the hatchery where it has a log of when we collected/claimed eggs so we know when our 24 hours is up for that specific claim slot.

#10: Update the collections to include the items that aren't currently part of a collection.




Hello everyone!
Llama

2:41am Jul 28 2014

Normal User


Posts: 777
Support for #1 and 2. It's say too much of a chore to search through individual pages of auctions.

#3 I don't think I could see happening. It has been said many times that there will be no plans to implement a direct name search.  Some users really dislike people constantly rmailing them for names to sell so I don't think it would be a good idea.

#5 I have no opinion on. I personally dont see a need for it.

#6, Absolutely no support. First of all,we have very few pets and items in the game that are of really high value and personally I wish we had more really rare items to chase after as it could create more goals for users to work towards. Secondly, I paid 400mil for my regression ray. Some people have paid significantly higher. They do still occasionally sell. They also provide a small living for those who have invested in one who sell zaps. It is one thing to devalue a pet, like how the bioscan event at one point reduced the price of an ivik to an all time low of 25mil. It is another thing in entirely to implement something that would stop some users making sufficient tu from zaps.

#7 I would be interested in how this could be reworked into gameplay so wold support.

#8 easily support this. With the never ending 20 year expire date all this results in is people clogging up the auctions as storage space or for merchants to use the actions with it's buy now function like their own rancher shop.

#9 I could support something like this. Like a message saying,you can pick up X number of eggs written in the hatchery or if you hit your limit a message like "you can collect eggs again in 4 hours and 5 minutes"

#10 kinda support though think that's what gets done anyway when new items are added or old ones are revamped sometimes




Thowra

3:07am Aug 1 2014

Normal User


Posts: 749
Support for everything but #5, simply because I think it's a bit late in the market now to introduce coloured beans. The main reason I say this is because of albinos, which are steadily inflating - I've seen people pay upwards of 40mil for one; I myself once spent 65mil on a albino pet for Kir because I was stuck for weeks and no one else was selling. Introduction of an 'albino' bean will drop their prices and I think it would make a lot of people who invested in albinos to be rather annoyed.

I want to elaborate on #6. I've heard both sides of the argument, and personally I support it. The rray is one of the most useful objects in the game, and while I understand that it 'negates' the high cost of them if they were released back into the game, if introduced properly I don't think it will affect the economy.
Take a look at retired eggs for instance. Usually once a year, they are released back into the market. Their price is still anywhere between 200-400mil. That is not cheap. Sure the eggs 'hatch' and 'disappear' from the game forever, but nattie retireds still go for 80-140mil. They haven't lost their value from being returned to the game.

Now if Rrays were released back into the game, maybe with every $100 purchase you can get one. That's fair. Not many people will throw a hundred bucks at a pet site this small. And yes, while people paid hundreds of millions of tu for their rrays, new users will have paid a hundred real life dollars for a bunch of pixels. Personally, I think that's fair.




RainofStars

11:57am Aug 2 2014 (last edited on 11:59am Aug 2 2014)

Normal User


Posts: 854
#1: Support

#2: Support

#3: No support. I get enough random rmails about my names. There are users who will search names for a fee if you really want to find something. The fees are not unreasonable for the amount of work involved. Some people depend on these services as income.

#4: Neutral (I wouldn't use it)

#5: I'm leaning toward no support here because it would make the purpose of the Natural colored Jelly Bean irrelevant, and that's an important item in the Cash Shop for making money for the site. I don't really even like the Calico Bean because it drags down the price of calico seasonals.

#6: I own one, and I have to charge a pretty low fee in my opinon for its use to keep up with the competition, so I'm not particularly happy about this idea. But I can see a benefit to the site (Rescreatu the business) if they introduced it in a way that would keep them rare and benefit the site with income, like how Thowra suggested. Neutral.

#7: Ye gods, support! We need more to do. We also need a way to get some more tu flowing into item sales.

#8:I've suggested the same thing in the past. I have no idea why this is allowed to continue. It's ridiculous and ties up people's tu if they accidentally bid on something that doesn't end for months, years, or decades. I say maximum time 3 weeks. Support x 1000!

#9: Support

#10: Support! And take out or combine duplicate collections like Brain Freeze and Snow Cones (they're pretty much the same thing!)
Go to page: 1